
Specimen R-01 · constructed example · Refusal Doctrine v0.3.3.1
CALIBRATED
Reference Predictor R-01, illustrative demonstration.
Passed across all five gates.
This page is a constructed specimen, not a verdict. No system was evaluated. The figures below are not observed on any system, and no ledger exists behind them. Where the text below speaks of an evaluation, a ledger or a reproduction, it describes what a real form would state.
Evaluated 2026-07-06 (constructed) · Ledger N = 512 predictions · Constructed by Sébastien Assohou as a specimen
Verdict scope statement · Doctrine v0.3.3.1 § 9.7
A verdict from Nyalai applies only within the scope stated above. Deployment outside this scope requires a new evaluation. Portfolio construction (weighting, correlation, volatility target, rebalancing cadence) is not validated by the five gates; it is the responsibility of the allocator.
Executive summary
Reference Predictor R-01 clears the five gates of the Refusal Doctrine v0.3.3.1.
Reference Predictor R-01 is an illustrative strategy constructed from published quality and low-volatility factors on a US large-cap universe. On a documented ledger of 512 resolved predictions evaluated by CalibrationJudge on 2026-07-06 (constructed), R-01 passes each of the five gates specified in the Refusal Doctrine v0.3.3.1.
The Brier Skill Score is positive and material. Regime segmentation identifies three distinct regimes, and R-01 remains profitable in every one. The guided-search safety test rejects the null hypothesis of overfitting after correction for the disclosed number of configurations tested. Calibration error sits well below the accepted threshold. The bootstrap confidence interval on skill excludes zero on the downside.
A verdict of CALIBRATED is not a guarantee of future returns. It is a statement that, as of 2026-07-06 (constructed), the strategy has survived a documented adversarial process against the specific gates of the Refusal Doctrine v0.3.3.1, within the scope declared in Section 9.7. Deployment beyond that scope requires a new evaluation.
This Verdict-form is published as a reference case. Its purpose is pedagogical: to make the shape of a passing verdict visible. Specimen N-01, also constructed, shows the shape of a refusal. Nyalai Verdict-form 002, on an external submission, was published beside it as a refusal; its verdict was withdrawn in October 2026 by correction notice CN-003, with no conclusion on the strategy.
Five gates · results
Each gate carries the burden of proof.
Every gate was met.
All five gate specifications and thresholds are defined in the Refusal Doctrine v0.3.3.1, published under Creative Commons Zero. Any independent third party can reproduce this evaluation from the same ledger.
Passage diagnostic
The passage is not luck. It rests on a stated, coherent source of edge.
A CALIBRATED verdict is more informative when the source of edge is named alongside the statistics. Reference Predictor R-01 declares an edge in the behavioral / risk-premium class, specifically a combined tilt on Novy-Marx gross-profits-to-assets and low-volatility ranking, applied to the US large-cap universe on a daily horizon.
The empirical signature matches the declaration. Cross-sectional exposure to the declared factors accounts for the majority of realized excess return, with residuals concentrated in periods where the two factors historically decouple. The Brier Skill Score decomposition confirms that the strategy's probability estimates are informative rather than merely correlated with realized outcomes.
The gates further show that the reported performance does not depend on a narrow window. Regime segmentation via HMM identifies low-vol, mid-vol, and crisis regimes; R-01 is positive in each. The Aronson-Masters guided-search correction rejects overfitting at p = 0.018 given the disclosed 42 configurations tested during construction. The bootstrap confidence interval on skill excludes zero on the downside, with a lower bound of 0.024.
A CALIBRATED verdict is time-bounded. R-01's verdict applies as of 2026-07-06 (constructed) and requires revalidation on the cadence declared under its Model Trust Level. Deployment beyond the sizing envelope stated in Section 9.7 above is out of scope.
Sovereignty rule seven
The party that produces a probabilistic claim never validates the same claim.
Sovereignty rule seven is the core operating constraint of Nyalai. It requires structural separation between the party that constructs a probabilistic system and the party that renders a verdict on it. Without that separation, the verdict is not a verdict. It is a self-report.
Reference Predictor R-01 is an illustrative construction. Its purpose is to make the shape and language of a CALIBRATED Verdict-form visible to readers. Being illustrative, it does not itself carry a live deployment recommendation. The sovereignty constraint would apply in full to any real strategy submitted by an external party.
Historical evaluation 001 was run on a system built by the founder, before any text of the Refusal Doctrine on file, and is not a verdict. Nyalai Verdict-form 002 is a case submitted from outside Nyalai; its verdict was withdrawn by correction notice CN-003. Reference R-01 is a constructed document that makes the form legible. It is not a verdict.
Audit trail
Evaluated by: none · constructed
Ledger size: 512 resolved predictions
Evaluated: 2026-07-06 (constructed)
Doctrine version: Refusal Doctrine v0.3.3.1
How to verify
The methodology and all five gate specifications are published under Creative Commons Zero. Any third party can request the ledger to reproduce the evaluation independently.
Requests: contact@nyalai.com
Sébastien Assohou
Constructed as a specimen · not a signed verdict
This Verdict-form and its underlying methodology are published under Creative Commons Zero.
Specimen: no hash, no timestamp, no signature. This page is a constructed example and not a verdict.
